Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than LG K52, getting a global score of 86.6 against 76. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should provide you very similar operating system features. The Galaxy A50s design is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG K52, although it was released just 13 months before.
The Galaxy A50s has a bit better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM. The Galaxy A50s counts with a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG K52 counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same sensor size and a 48 megapixels resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s and LG K52 count with extremely similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.