Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG K52's global score of 76. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG K52. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than LG K52, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K52 and the Galaxy A51 5G feature similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G captures much better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.