Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the LG K52's 76 global score. Although Galaxy A71 is older than the LG K52, it's construction is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 has newer 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A71 features a slightly better looking display than LG K52, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little larger screen and a greater pixel density. LG K52 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a processor that's just as good as the LG K52 one, and although the Galaxy A71 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A71 features a much better camera than LG K52, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG K52, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.