Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the LG K52, with an 85.2 score against 76. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG K52, although it was released 2 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a processing unit that is just as good as the LG K52 one, and although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor taking way worse quality videos and photographs and a camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG K52 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.