Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than LG K52, getting a global score of 97.6 against 76. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG K52 has Android 10, providing some nice extra features. Although Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than the LG K52, it's design is still thinner.
The Galaxy Fold features just a bit better screen than LG K52, because it has a greater number of pixels per display inch, a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. The Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller sensor taking lot worse quality pictures and a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.