Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than LG K52's 76 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 body is lighter and just a bit thinner than LG K52, although it was released just a little over a year before. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a little better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixel number per inch in the display and a way higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor shooting lot lower quality videos and photos and a lot less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments and a way higher video definition.
The LG K52 has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.