Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than the LG K52, having an 86.3 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG K52, even though it was released a little bit further than a year before. The Galaxy S10e has a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG K52 features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG K52, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera and a way smaller sensor shooting lot lower quality photos and videos, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
The LG K52 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.