Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the LG K52, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 76. Galaxy S20 FE's construction has the same thickness than LG K52, but it is a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has a more recent 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with slightly more storage for applications and games than LG K52, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better battery performance than LG K52, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.