Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than LG K52, having a overall score of 95.4 against 76. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and LG K52 has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the LG K52.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because it has a little bigger screen, a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior processor than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The LG K52 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than LG K52, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much bigger back camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery life than LG K52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.