| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is much better than the LG K52, having an 87.4 score against 76. The Samsung Galaxy S6 construction is noticeably lighter and thinner than the LG K52, even though it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 has 5.0 version and LG K52 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with an incredibly better screen than LG K52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a much greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG K52 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S6 features a bit faster processing unit than LG K52, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S6 captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lot worse quality photos, a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
LG K52 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2550mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.