Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than LG K52's 76 general score. Samsung Galaxy S7 is an much older device than LG K52, but Samsung could make it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much sharper screen than LG K52, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much higher pixels density.
LG K52 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG K52 also has a higher number of faster cores. LG K52 features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K52 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG K52 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The LG K52 counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.