Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K52 has a global score of 76, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Although the LG K52 is just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and also noticeably newer. LG K52 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG K52 also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG K52 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K52 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
LG K52 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's battery duration is just as good as LG K52's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.