Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the LG K52, having a score of 78.1 against 76. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge body is a little thinner and lighter than the LG K52, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S7 edge has a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way higher pixels amount per inch of screen. The LG K52 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K52 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the LG K52 also has a greater number of cores. LG K52 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K52 also counts with a larger camera sensor and a much more MP back facing camera.
LG K52 features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.