Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is better than the LG K52's general score of 76. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the LG K52.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a better looking display than LG K52, because it has a higher pixels count in each inch of display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG K52, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
LG K52 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery duration than LG K52, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.