Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the LG K52's 76 global score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than LG K52, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit superior CPU than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than LG K52, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better video quality.
LG K52 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG K52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery life than LG K52, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.