Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Titanium and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than LG K61, with an 82.5 score against 77.6. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is older than LG K61, it's construction is lighter and thinner. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has older 8.0 Oreo version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than LG K61, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V30S ThinQ has as much memory to store more apps and games as the LG K61 one, both of them have the same internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a better camera than LG K61, because although it has a way less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG K61 features better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.