Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than LG K61, with an 87.1 score against 77.6. LG Velvet's design is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the LG K61, although both of them were only released 1 months apart. The LG Velvet counts with a bit superior processor than LG K61, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG K61 and the LG Velvet count with very similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. LG Velvet's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as LG K61's one, they have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet has a greater camera than LG K61, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG Velvet also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The LG Velvet features just a bit better battery life than LG K61, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.