Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than LG K61, with an 83.8 score against 77.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than the LG K61, it's body is a little bit thinner and lighter. LG K61 and Samsung Galaxy A50 both feature quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A50 and LG K61 both have really similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The LG K61 has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K61 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 takes greater photos and videos than LG K61, although it has a camera with a way worse resolution and a worse 1920x1080 video definition. The LG K61 and the Samsung Galaxy A50 count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.