Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG K61, having a overall score of 98 against 77.6. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than LG K61. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better hardware performance than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit sharper display than LG K61, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a higher display density and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than LG K61, because it has a way higher video quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels. LG K61 counts with more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K61 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery life than LG K61, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.