Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than LG K61, with a 95.4 score against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than LG K61, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than LG K61, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster CPU than LG K61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than LG K61, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution. LG K61 has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG K61 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than LG K61, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.