Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than LG K61, getting an 88.5 score against 77.6. Although Galaxy Z Flip and LG K61 were released only a few months apart, Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and a bit lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking display than LG K61, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster CPU than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots greater pictures and videos than LG K61, because although it has a way less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. LG K61 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG K61 features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.