Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the LG K61's global score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is thinner and just a bit lighter than the LG K61, even though both of them were released with only 3 months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better performance than LG K61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid screen than LG K61, because it has a little better pixel count in each inch in the display, a little bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
LG K61 has much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K61 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than LG K61, because although it has a camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.