Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Titanium and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the LG K61, getting a general score of 94.6 against 77.6. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version and LG K61 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner but extremely heavier than the LG K61, and both were released only a couple of months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better processing power than LG K61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that's just as good as the LG K61 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better photographs and videos than LG K61, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality. The LG K61 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery performance than LG K61, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.