Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. Although Google Pixel 3 is notably older than the LG K62, it's body is just a bit thinner and extremely lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a much better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
The LG K62 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better performance than LG K62. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The LG K62 has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent more battery size. LG K62 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the LG K62 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.