Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the LG K62, getting an 82.9 score against 78.2. The Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the LG K62, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10, providing you some additional features and a performance increase.
The Google Pixel 4a and LG K62 both have very similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 4a has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4a features a more vivid screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
LG K62 counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K62 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution and a way larger sensor.
The LG K62 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.