Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K62 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a bit better than HTC U11's 77.6 score. Even though the LG K62 is notably newer than HTC U11, it is just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. HTC U11 has a brighter display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater screen pixel density.
HTC U11 counts with a little bit better processing power than LG K62. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The HTC U11's camera is just as good as the LG K62 one, because although the HTC U11 has a lot smaller back camera sensor which gives a much lower photo and video quality and a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG K62 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The LG K62 has improved battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.