Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than LG K62, having a global score of 81 against 78.2. LG G7 ThinQ is an noticeably older phone than the LG K62, but it is lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG K62 has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG K62 features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than LG K62. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than LG K62, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor providing a much worse image quality and a back camera with a way lower 16 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
LG K62 has improved battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.