Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is slightly better than the LG K62's 78.2 score. The LG G8 ThinQ body has the same thickness than LG K62, but it is somewhat lighter. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and LG K62 has Android 10 version.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better screen than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
LG G8 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution and a much tinier back camera sensor which offers a lot worse image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG G8 ThinQ features as much storage to install games and applications as the LG K62, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 counts with a little better battery life than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.