Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the LG K62's 78.2 global score. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is a lot older than LG K62, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while LG K62 has Android 10 version.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot better number of pixels per inch of display. LG V30S ThinQ's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to LG K62's one, both of them have equal internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a camera that is just as good as LG K62's camera, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera and a much tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG K62 counts with better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.