Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than LG K62's 78.2 global score. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 operating system. LG V40 ThinQ's design is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than LG K62, although it was released many years before.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG K62 has a greater memory for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG K62 features greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera and a way smaller sensor which offers a lot worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.