Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the LG K62, with a score of 87.1 against 78.2. LG Velvet is a just a bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than the LG K62, even though both were released with only 7 months difference. LG Velvet features a little bit better performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG Velvet features a more vivid screen than LG K62, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. The LG Velvet features a superior camera than LG K62, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG Velvet's memory for games and applications is just as good as the LG K62 one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K62, because it has an 8 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.