Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-27 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K62 has a general score of 78.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Even though LG K62 is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the LG K62 has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Moto Z Force counts with a much better screen than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixels density and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. LG K62 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG K62 also has a larger number of faster cores.
The LG K62 features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K62 also has 128 GB internal memory. LG K62 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z Force takes a bit better videos and photos than LG K62, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.