Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is much better than the LG K62's 78.2 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features. Although Motorola razr (2020) and the LG K62 were released with only 2 months difference, Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is a little heavier but a bit thinner than the LG K62.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit sharper screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG K62, and although they both have a same size camera sensor and a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture. The LG K62 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG K62 counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.