Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the LG K62's global score of 78.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10. Galaxy A51's body is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG K62, despite of the fact that it was released just 11 months before.
The Galaxy A51 features a brighter screen than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel number per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A51 and LG K62 feature very similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A51 has a superior camera than LG K62, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same size sensor and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much higher video quality. The LG K62 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a battery life that is just as good as LG K62's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.