Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than LG K62, having a score of 90.8 against 78.2. The Galaxy A51 5G is a better device than the LG K62, we must highlight that it is also a a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much better display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much better screen pixels density. LG K62 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a processor that's just as good as the LG K62 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit longer battery life than LG K62, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.