Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG K62, having a 97.6 score against 78.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG K62 has Android 10. The Galaxy Fold design is thinner than LG K62, but it is much heavier and was released about a year before.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold has a little sharper screen than LG K62, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher 1536 x 2152px resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a lot lower image quality, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Galaxy Fold features a bit bigger memory for applications and games than LG K62, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a bit superior battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.