Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is a little bit better than the LG K62, with a score of 85 against 78.2. The Galaxy M40 body is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the LG K62, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy M40 has a more vivid screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much higher pixels density. LG K62 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K62 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M40, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy M40 counts with a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor which provides a way lower photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way worse 32 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture.
LG K62 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.