Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the LG K62's 78.2 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note 5 is extremely older than LG K62, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution. LG K62 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K62 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG K62 also has more cpu cores. The LG K62 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG K62, because although it has a smaller aperture, a lot smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a way worse 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.