Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the LG K62, getting an 89 score against 78.2. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note10 is older than LG K62, it's design is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better screen than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a way higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG K62, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a lot smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The LG K62 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K62 counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.