Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K62 has a global score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 overall score. The LG K62 is a just a little heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note4, but both of them are equally thin. LG K62 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG K62 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note4 has a more vivid screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way higher pixel count per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note4's camera is just as good as LG K62's camera, because although the Galaxy Note4 has a much lower resolution camera in the back, a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and videos and a lot smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The LG K62 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG K62 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.