Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than LG K62's global score of 78.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S10 body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than LG K62, even though it was released just a little over a year before.
The Galaxy S10 features a little faster CPU than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a way better screen than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a way higher screen density.
The Galaxy S10 features a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way less MP back-facing camera and a way tinier back camera sensor which offers a way worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG K62 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K62 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.