Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than LG K62, getting a 94.8 score against 78.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version. Galaxy S20's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the LG K62, even though they were released with only 9 months difference.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 features an incredibly better looking screen than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way higher screen density.
LG K62 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in LG K62.
Galaxy S20 has a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.