Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than LG K62, having a 90.8 score against 78.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10, so it provides the user some additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy S20 FE design has the same thickness than the LG K62, but it's a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better looking display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much greater pixels count per inch of display.
The LG K62 counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG K62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit longer battery performance than LG K62, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.