Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the LG K62, getting a 98 score against 78.2. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than LG K62. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a sharper screen than LG K62, because it has a much higher display pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than LG K62, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. The LG K62 has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with longer battery performance than LG K62, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.