Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than LG K62's overall score of 78.2. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer, a bit thinner and lighter than the LG K62. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while LG K62 has Android 10, so it provides the user some additional features.
Galaxy S22 has just a little better performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display pixels density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
LG K62 counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG K62 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots way better pictures and videos than LG K62, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.