Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the LG K62, having a 95.4 score against 78.2. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer than the LG K62's, although it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than LG K62, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. LG K62 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video definition, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features superior battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.