Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is slightly better than the LG K62, having a general score of 83.3 against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a somewhat lighter device than LG K62, but both are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a bit superior processor than LG K62. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better display than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per display inch and a lot better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The LG K62 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K62 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The Galaxy S9 takes a bit better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a way smaller sensor capturing much lower quality videos and photographs and a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a much better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.