Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than LG K62's global score of 78.2. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is older than the LG K62, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Flip has a much better looking screen than LG K62, because it has a little bigger display, way more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The LG K62 features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better performance than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG K62, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and images and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG K62 has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.