Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than LG K62's 78.2 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than LG K62, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processor than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a brighter display than LG K62, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636, a way better number of pixels per screen inch and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a lot lower image quality and a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much higher video definition.
The LG K62 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K62 features better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.