Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the LG K62's global score of 78.2. Although it's the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little better performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than LG K62, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger display and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
LG K62 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery life than LG K62, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior camera than LG K62, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a camera with much more mega pixels and a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.